By Gary Littlejohn (auth.)
Read or Download A Sociology of the Soviet Union PDF
Best russia books
Put up yr notice: First released in 1993 via M. E. Sharpe
On August 19, 1991, 8 high-ranking Soviet officers took over the govt. of the USSR and proclaimed themselves its new rulers. under seventy-two hours later, their coup had collapsed, however it could switch the process historical past in a manner that not anyone - not at all the plotters themselves - may have foreseen.
The editor of this quantity, who witnessed those momentous occasions, have assembled firsthand bills of the tried coup. They contain tales from "junta" participants and army officials, resistance leaders and traditional electorate, Muscovites and citizens of alternative locales, Russian and overseas newshounds, international viewers and returning emigres, in addition to Mikhail Gorbachev and Boris Yeltsin. Key files and pictures supplement the person bills.
The provocative advent to the amount locations the August occasions within the higher context - from the early days of perestroika and glasnost to the second one disagreement on the White condominium, in October 1993.
Drawing on infrequent and formerly unpublished photos followed through in-depth captions, the publication presents an soaking up research of this anxious interval of the second one international struggle. It finds intimately how the conflict of Kursk used to be the start of the top and the way this huge operation ended in the purple military recapturing large components of the Soviet Union and bleeding white the German armies it struck.
This moment and ultimate quantity of the author's definitive examine of the Revolution of 1905 and its aftermath specializes in the years 1906 and 1907, and specifically at the fight over the Duma, the elected legislature that was once the key final result of the occasions of 1905.
Few political figures of the 20 th century have aroused as a lot controversy because the Russian innovative Leon Trotsky. Trotsky’s awesome lifestyles and huge writings have left an indelible mark on innovative moral sense, but there has been a threat that his identify might disappear from background. initially released in 1954, Deutscher’s magisterial three-volume biography used to be the 1st significant booklet to counter the robust Stalinist propaganda desktop.
- Marshal of Victory: The Autobiography of General Georgy Zhukov
- Russian Contributions to Invertebrate Behavior
- Lake Peipus The Battle of Ice
- The Silence of God
- The Whisperers: Private Life in Stalin's Russia
Extra info for A Sociology of the Soviet Union
M. Miller's article 'Comparative Social Mobility', Current Sociology, 1960, was somewhat misplaced, since Miller had inaccurately computed the rates of social mobility in the USSR on the basis of data provided by A. Inkeles and R. A. Bauer, The Soviet Citizen, Oxford University Press, 1959. Correct use by Miller of the data produced by lnkeles and Bauer, it was argued, would have shown that the Soviet Union had a different 'mobility profile' from that of the USA. This conclusion was further supported by the use of Miller's criteria in the analysis of the data for women supplied by lnkeles and Bauer.
These critiques are by no means the same. Marx's 'Capital' and Capitalism Today, for example, contains a critique of the Sraffan concept of the economy. For example, L. Harris, 'The Science of the Economy', Economy and Society, vol. 7, no. 3, August 1978. It must be said, however, that Harris's article seems to be based on the supposition that one cannot both understand the labour theory of value and be critical of it. The debate is continued in Economy and Society, vol. 8, no. 3, August 1979. Various somewhat different comments on the difficulties of using the concepts of the labour theory of value for analysing the division oflabour have already been made in G.
In other words, what pattern of differential access to the means of production would prevent some agents from predominating in a fashion which seriously diminished the capacities of other agents? To claim that a situation arises where no set of agents predominates in determining the conditions of access comes close to claiming that the division of labour does not produce differential capacities in economic agents: in other words, that the division oflabour does not produce important effects, and does not really matter.